Terrorists

Hi, Locke here. Sorry for not posting anything lately.

Many of you who actually read what I write, know that I hate terrorists. I will provide a list of the most cruel terrorist organisations.

1. ISIS/ISIL
The Islamic State or ISIS, has the disgusting habit of beheading journalists in the name of Allah. I also want to point out that ISIS has more land and money then most other terrorist organisations, making it really scary. In the Syrian city, Palmyra, about 400 people were killed. Most of the dead were women and children. This all happened on Wednesday. One of their most cruel acts, using children to kill people, I already described (http://theworldouttherelocke.blogspot.com/2015/03/isis-kills-teen-spy.html). ISIS also kills Christians and tourists (http://theworldouttherelocke.blogspot.com/2015/03/isis-tunisia-and-israel.html)

2. Boko Haram
The second, Boko Haram is a terrible organisation. Inhabiting uncivilised Northern Nigeria, it implements one of the harshest Sharia laws in the world. It murders children, women and the elder. It once kidnapped about 300 schoolgirls and made them into suicide bombers, or child brides.

3. Hamas
Hamas has been plaguing Israel for decades, uses children as shields and kills innocents. Must I say more?
4. Taliban
The Taliban removes education from women, forces suicide bombings, and kills everyone who disagrees. The last statement sounds a bit like North Korea.

If you disagree with the order, please comment below.

Germ Line Engineering (Designer Babies)

Germ-line Engineering is the process that creates genetically modified humans a.k.a. designer babies.  This technology is based around how bacteria defend themselves against viruses. When the bacteria is attacked, it sends guide RNA. The guide RNA, goes to the virus and, using enzyme CAS9, cuts out parts of the DNA, and replaces them. Scientists created CRISPR which is based off of bacterial defense mechanism.

CRISPR allows a scientist to screw around with an egg or a sperm's DNA. A scientist can remove a mutated part and replace it with a healthier part. They can also change the eye colour, change hair colour, skin colour, mental power, physical strength, etc. This all sounds great, but it is unpredictable. In an MIT study, only 20% of monkeys that had Germ-line Engineering, had the modified genes at birth (or any other time). So it only works in 20% of cases. In the 80% of failures, unfortunate mutations might arise. Also, some trials resulted with the death of the patient. So, it is not a good investment.

An issue with genetically modified humans, is the lack of genetical diversity. If everyone is changing their genes to create some desired qualities, then it is safe to assume the genetical diversity will slowly go away. Imagine a world were almost everyone is the same. Now imagine a world with genetically modified humans. You should be imagining the same thing. Now imagine if a superbug would arise. It would be the Irish Potato Famine, but with humans.

Many people complain about the rich having more opportunities then the poor. Well this would make the advantages a lot bigger. A "designer baby" is expensive. So only the rich could afford to create a prefect child. Now that sounds unfair.

Also, playing god is never a good thing. God made us in his image. Why mess it up?

(If you don't believe in God) We evolved into a powerful race. Why should we mess it up?

Evolution WILL create the stronger and superior race we desire. While we are tampering with genes we might screw up, big time. There are hundreds of horrors that could result from screwing with our genes.

We should stop researching into designer babies. NOW!

Drones and al Qaeda

Sorry for not posting anything for sometime.

Drones have become renewed political topic. This is not because of leftist pleading for terrorist's rights (haha, the left pleading for rights). This is because of the death of an al Qaeda held, American hostage.

Now, drones are a very strange topic. This is mainly because most liberals and conservatives approve of drones. I could easily say that this argument is Americans verses Terrorists. But that wouldn't be politically correct. I instead would have to say "American Citizens verses Freedom Fighters".

Both ways, drones are amazing. They are accurate, which causes them to kill more terrorists then civilians. Hostages would never be killed if the terrorist would be gone, correct? So, instead of whining about current hostages. Whine about the hostages that would be killed if America couldn't use drones.

There are more and better argument. Chances are, you can just call the person you are arguing against a terrorist.

Cuba

I have a joke. Obama's foreign affairs. Why is Obama meeting with Castro but not Benjamin Netanyahu? Castro is defiantly not an American ally, while Israel is on "Team America". Why is Obama meeting with an enemy?

Religious Freedom

Hi, Locke here. In Indiana a new law was pasted, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). This law has caused uproar in the liberal community, because it sort of allows discrimination. Lets just assume it does (it doesn't really allow it). Liberals call it a discriminatory law because it allows businesses not to provide service to members of the LGBTQ club, due to religious reasons. This makes it sound as if businesses never had the right to selective distribution. This is a fallacy, because, in the news, bakeries have refused to create custom made wedding cakes. 

Long story short, this law protects the rights of businesses to refuse to create special products, due to religious reasons. If I was a tattoo artist and someone asks me to make a tattoo saying "I cheated on my wife, then raped, and murdered her" I could refuse, because my religion prohibits adultery, rape, and murder. This is not a discriminatory bill, it is an empowering one. 

One final statement. The media seems to think that only Christians don't like against gays, remember, most Muslim countries forbid homosexuality. 

Feminism and Racism

Over the past week I mentioned how we are starting to be racist to white people. I also think that we are becoming sexist to males.

First, racism to white people. In this society we are taught that white people are the oppressors, and minorities are the poor helpless victims. If you find this racist, than you are a logical person. But yet many people still believe that white people have to atone for their ancestor's sins, and white people, as a whole, are evil and cruel. Yet, none of this is racist, but when people say that a person is black, people jump up and yell "Racist".

In school, we learn about how men have screwed over society, and such. But, that is okay because men are inherently destructive and cruel (sarcasm). Teachers in school clearly favour girls over boys, so girls are better, right? Not really, but this is what we are taught. If you disagree, please comment below.

Over all, our society is reversing itself. We now are racist to white people, and sexist to men. This is a greatly unfortunate change because I am both a male and white. Oh well, I guess I have to pay for the actions of other people's ancestors (my family is an immigrant family, so we never screwed over black people, or women).

ISIS, Tunisia and Israel

On March 18, 2015, a very unfortunate thing happened. Terrorists attacked a Tunisian Museum. This attack killed 23 people and injured over 50 more. The attack happened when the terrorists, dressed as soldiers, went into the museum and held the people hostage. The police broke through and shot both of the terrorists and one officer lost his life.

After this horrific event, ISIS claimed that this was "the first drop of rain". This is a metaphor to a storm, and ISIS is saying that there is more to come. Since ISIS is in the Middle East, it will take time for it to get to American. You know how nearly ever terrorist organisation hates Israel? Strangely enough ISIS doesn't as much. ISIS says that it must purify the Muslims first before moving on the other religions. This is great news. That means that Israel is safe. But not for long. Hamas and ISIS are Sunni, this means that they will eventually join together. Now this is very bad. Since the United States are so worried about the civilians, they will never squash ISIS. So, ISIS will expand and get into Lebanon and Jordan. Once it is there, it will, with Hamas, attack Israel. Now this is bad. Can Israel fight a war on two front, especially with the UN against it?

Please, take a moment of silence for the 23 people that ISIS has killed.

Race and Crime Statistics no. 1

In 2012, 123 African Americans were killed by the police.
In 2012, 326 White people were killed by the police.
Even though African Americans from 1980-2008 made up 53 percent of murderers, they only made up about 13 percent of the population.
A more recent study shows that in 2013 African Americans committed 5375 murders, and whites committed 4396 murders.


The underlining fact is that African Americans are disproportionately more likely to be murderers and less likely to be shot by a police officer.

Sources
http://www.inquisitr.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States

Drinking Age

The drinking age has been a topic disputed by many people. On one hand people people believe that the drinking age should be lowered. On the other hand, they believe that it should stay the same. Being the logical person I am I take the "stay the same" side. I take this side because I don't believe in ruining people's lives, increasing crime, and no regulation.

A child has a developing body and brain. If you add alcohol to the mix, then the child's mind will not properly grow and develop. According to http://www.toosmarttostart.samhsa.gov/, says that alcohol in a developing mind can impair the drinkers judgement permanently. This could harm many other people. If the drinker was a construction worker s/he might decide that dropping the steel beams on a car would be smart. Another example would be the person might be a taxi driver and might decide to speed which gets him/her into an accident. Nearly every job requires judgement skills. This person would cause accidents and in dangerous the populous.

Drunk people cause crime. Teenagers don't have a fully developed "judgement center ", due to this they are more prone to getting drunk (because they will drink too much). A friend offers another a beer, which would only be legal with the lower drinking age, they get drunk. Then they burn down a school or something like that. Drunk people commit more crime.

Most people are law obeying citizens. You might be surprised but in areas where there is a lower drinking age there are more issues. Amongst those issue is unintended pregnancy. This is completely rational. If teens are drinking they will have more unprotected sex. The New York Times says that the lower the drinking age the lower the "crime hump" (the crime hump is the most common age for a criminal, currently it is 21-23, it correlates with the drinking age). A lower drinking age means more stupid decisions and at a lower age.

There are no good reasons to lower the drinking age, at all. The biggest argument on the opposing side is that they are already adults and can do what they want with their body, and mind. Adults or not, rules still apply to them. I can't tell the police officer that I shouldn't get a ticket because I am an adult. Adults still have restrictions.

Lowering the Drinking Age is a stupid idea because it ruins people's lives, causes crime, and bad decisions. Overall, why would you?

Police Officers Shot in Ferguson

In Ferguson, Missuri, two police officers were shot. An activist and also a verbal witness (heard the crime) said something horrifying, " We were getting victories, the dominos were falling and they were toppling almost daily so we were almost out there celebrating more than protesting.".

Activists in general are annoying. But when they practically support the shooting of police officers, they are cruel and heartless beings. Police officers aren't monsters. They aren't murderers, they are just normal people. Actually they are better than normal people because they put their life at risk to save yours.

So lets get this straight. People are attacking police officers, the people who protect you every single day. What ingratitude. These people are biting the hand that feeds them.

Back to the officers. The officers both survived and will be recovering. There is a new hashtag #BlueLivesMatter. This is referring to police officers. I truly hope that they will fully recover.

 I am truly starting to believe that these activists are just thugs, and sadists. Many police officers have been assaulted by these sadists. When activists become sadists, is the time when their movement turns into hate and slowly crumbles. These sadists support a stupid cause and do so violently. You know who else supported a stupid violent cause? Hitler. I am not comparing the murder of 6 million Jews to the murder a couple cops, but I am comparing Hitler to police killers. Both are brutal murders. They both have and had many supporters. They both are idiots.

Overall, two police officers were shot by sadists, and activists have slowly become sadists and thugs.
I hope our president does something about this.

When Black Lives are More Important

Hi, Locke here. The term "Black Lives Matter" has sparked this opinionated speech.

Sometime ago there was this African America boy,  Michael Brown, who attacked a police officer and was shot. When the police officer was not put on trial, they burned their town down. So, when a black kid gets killed in self defence it is a crime and a town burns down. In contrast when Dillon Taylor, an unarmed white person, was shot by black officer, nothing happens. Where is Dillon's town?

Really look at the cases, they are almost the same. Washington Times says that "the cases are nearly identical". Where is Taylor's front page article? Where are his riots? Does he not deserve them? Rosh Limbaugh explains that the current world view is that Whites are the oppressors and African Americans are the saintly victims. His exact words are, "In the current climate in the United States, a black person can never be an oppressor, and a white person can never be a victim."

Where are the MSNBC head lines? Well they never wrote a story on it. If you look up Michael Brown on MSNBC there are 30 pages of stories (there are actually 30 pages of stories). On CNN, for Taylor there is one video. For Michael Brown on CNN there are 2790 results.

Dillon isn't the only one. The media is incredibly liberal and ensures that everyone else believes these views. Minorities are treated as if they are better than everyone else. This "minority rule" only applies if you are the "right minority" i.e. African American, hispanic, Native American etc..

The media and people, believe these fallacies to be self evident, only African Americans can be victims and White people are always the oppressors, and "right minorities" are superior to "normal minorities".

Cockroaches and Individualism

Hi, Locke here. Lets talk about science. Many animals move in herds. They think as a group. Ants, act as one large individual. Many insects do the same. In an experiment they found that cockroaches are different. They placed 16 cockroaches in a large container with shade in the center. Each pest had a tracker on it's back. They were able to use the tracker to time the cockroaches.

The experiment was meant to find out how cockroaches make decisions. If they all came to the shade at the same time, then they are one entity and like ants. If each one of then moves there at different times, then they are individuals like sheep, bats, and humans. The findings tells us that we are like cockroaches. We are individual.

Each cockroach had a different time and a different "personality". Some roaches went straight for the shade, others took their time. The roaches that explored their confinement, were bold and explorations. The roaches that went straight for the shelter are shy, and meek. They began to have personalities and individualism.

Since I don't believe in a Procrustean Society, I like differences amongst people. People really aren't that different. The people who say that they are individuals, "their own person" and stuff like that, are normally the people who are the most similar. No really, they try so hard to be different they end up being almost the same. They have become what they most fear, part of society. Then the other social caste all contain people that are very similar. I am not saying that this is bad, just interesting.

The next time you kill a pest, think about its individualism and how it had a family to feed, or just kill the thieving pest. Your choice.

When Children Become Terrorist Tools

Hi, Locke here. In a previous post I told you about Muhammad Musallam, an ISIS terrorist who had a false confession of spying and was killed by a child. This really horrifies me. ISIS used a child as an executioner. This isn't even the first time they did this. Think about it. ISIS convinced a kid to shot another human in the head. How in the world did they do this? But they aren't the only one. I wrote some information on the major players in the islamic terror cup.

Hamas has this thing with using civilian casualties to their advantage. Other than shooting rockets from civilian residences and populated areas, they also use children as shields. Shields have really devolved. They went from humans, to wood, to metal, to big tanks, and back to humans. Children either guard rockets or are suicide bombers. A Nobel Prize Winner by the name of Elie Wiesel agrees with me and says that it is a war between people who "celebrate life and those who champion death". Israel is the celebrator of life. Hamas is the child murderer.

A little known islamic terrorist organisation known as Boko Haram also uses children as weapons. They went through Baga and Doron Baga killing around 2,000 men, women, children, and everyone who wasn't fast enough. The not so lucky ones where the 300 girls who were kidnapped. Many of them where used as suicide bombers. The "lucky ones" became child brides.

Hizbollah is a strange group. Hizbollah has a multi-million pound amusement park. The park is there to convert the children into martyrdom. They stuff fallacies down those poor children's throats. The children can see guns, tanks, and barbed fences. The children are "explained" that suicide, murder and firing 4,000 missiles at Israel in a short period of time is okay.

Now lets talk about the Taliban. This group is famous for these immoral actions. In December, they killed 132 children at a Pakistani school. The Taliban is in the long list of terrorists who use children as bombs. During the Taliban's fight with Afghan forces, they used children to gather information, and as bombs. They brainwash children into killing themselves. It truly is horrible. The Taliban also deny eduction to females, but I think suicide bombing is a bit worse.

Here are some stats. Over 300,000 child soldiers exist in the world. The Taliban has several thousand suicide bombers. 42 percent of 18-30 year old French Muslims believe in suicide bombing. 25 percent of Spanish Muslims believe in suicide bombings. Girls make up 10-30 percent of child soldiers and are often used for sexual reasons. You know what Afghanistan, India, Iran, Libya, Mali, Pakistan, Sudan, Syria and Yemen have in common? Other than the large Muslim population, they all had child soldiers in 2011.

I would like a moment of silence for all these dead children. Israel haters, like these terrorists, support child deaths. Could you tell a child that they have to kill themselves because you are mad at Israel, who gives you health care?


Sources
http://centralasiaonline.com
http://rouge-enforcer.weebly.com
bbc.com
wikipedia.com
wordpress.com
dosomething.org

About this blog

The World Out There 

                             News, Science, Politics, and Everything Else 

                                                    By Locke

                      About the blog( This can be found on the Home Page)

  I like the world. This statement explains nearly nothing. How about this. I want to preserve the world. I will present the news, and everything though an "I want to live lens", or a "preservist lens"    (I just made up a word!). I will explain the news and everything else and explain the threats to national security. A good example of a threat is Iran's troubling nuclear program.  I will also report on random things. An example of that is trends and stuff like that. Another thing that I will report on is science. Science is generally amazing. I will explain plasma, quarks and everything in between. My favorite and last of the things I will report on are political stories, and facts. An example would be Israel being the good guy. If you disagree with Israel's status then you kind of support a terrorist organisation.

The fight is Israel vs. Hamas, a terrorist organization, if you don't support Israel than you support Hamas. Middle Eastern affairs are normally Jews +Conservatives + Religious Christians+ Logical People vs. Muslims +Terrorists +Liberals+ Idiots + some Atheists. Strangely, many people end up on the second side, the one with the terrorists.

The bad side. Note the children holding guns.

The good side!

ISIS kills a teen "Spy"

Hello, Locke here. I am going to provide you with some horrid news. An Arab child accused of being an Israeli spy was killed today. His name was Muhammad Musallam, he was 19 years old. He confessed to being part of the Mossad, the effective Israeli intelligence agency and said that his father told him to do it. His father said that he never did this. The Mossad also said he wasn't a spy.

During his confession, he warned others not to do want he did i.e. spy against ISIS. His exact words where,"I tell my father and son: Repent to God. I say to the spies who spy on ISIS: You will not be successful, they will expose you". This makes it clear that he isn't a real spy. ISIS seems to not be good at spy detection and needed to prevent people from spying. They also clearly aren't good at cover ups either. They need a lesson from Obama and the KBG. You know what Obama and ISIS have in common?
They both have no clue what they are doing. That wasn't meant as a joke. But do you what to hear a joke? Of course you do. Obama's plan against ISIS. Now that's a knee slapper. Back to executions.

Musallam was killed by a child. This really horrifies me. The kid shot Mussallam in the forehead, then shouted, "Allah is great". Think about it. ISIS convinced a kid to shot another human in the head. How in the world did they do this? There are a couple things about this that bother me. First, a kid was the executioner.  Seriously, ISIS has reached a true low. Killing journalists was bad, but when they poison little children's minds and souls in their jihadist conquest, their evil levels go straight down to hell. Second, the kid shouted, "Allah is great.". This kind of bothers me. What kind of god tells his/her people to murder a bunch of humans. In the Quran it says to kill nonbeliever, but how come Islam is so seductive and managed to persuade so many people? There are more Islam extremists then another type of extremist. How did this happen? Please answer in the comments.

Please take a moment of silence for Muhammad Musallam, and all the others that will be killed by ISIS, because Obama would do anything to stop them.